Multi-agent Debate

I hope there is a button to allow Multi-agent Debate Mode. This is I think even more useful than parallel agent output. MAD can save so much time analyzing a complicated topic, especially those with many sub-topics (ex: should universal basic income be implemented in the next years?)

[MECHANICS]
- Two or more AI language models debate a user-provided topic through structured, round-based interaction.
- The human user:
a) observes all outputs at every stage;
b) may intervene between rounds;
c) remains the final arbiter of whether consensus has been reached.

[FEATURE REQUEST]
- Please add a file attachment tool that allows the human user to upload and provide multiple reference files simultaneously to all participating LLMs.
- The file attachment tool should support, at minimum:
1. PDF files
2. .txt files
3. Markdown files
4. docx/MS Office/LibreOffice files
- The attached files should be available as shared reference material for any/all LLMs during the debate.
- The human user should be able to attach files before the debate begins and, ideally, also between rounds when asking follow-up questions or requesting clarification.

** A strong multi-LLM debate protocol should not imitate a loose human panel discussion. It should behave more like a formal academic debate with controlled rounds, visible transcripts, forced engagement.

- A multi-agent debate protocol should also offer the option to:
- have the MAD protocol decide whether there has been full consensus on the entire list of topics, or
- allow a human judge to decides whether true consensus has actually been reached on any or all of the discussion points.